Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Full Review
by JK Rowling
The Harry Potter series reaches its climax with a dark, sinister shadow cast over the
future of England. There is no point in pretending that Deathly Hallows, with all
its torture, scenes of humiliation, death, and destruction is a pleasant read.
Anything but. But in many ways it is the finest of the Harry Potter novels.
The style of writing is brave, ambitious. In substance, the plot is equally
daring.
There are problems too. A very unfortunate use of the pensieve - a magical memory
device - to resolve certain aspects of the plot, and which amounts to little more
than a series of poorly constructed flashbacks.
And even more problematic, the chapter King's Cross - a surreal confessional scene
that stands out as being unquestionably the worst chapter in the series. The
narrative style here is mechanistic, lacking in emotional intensity and is an
unconvincing way to resolve certain important plot lines and even more unforgivably
to prepare the reader for the conclusion to the novel.
That said what remains of the novel is impressive. There is not one main storyline,
but three. Each intricately interwoven with the others: the two stories of two
individuals seeking to fulfill the same prophecy and the story of the quest for the
Deathly Hallows - objects that provide the possessor with the means to worse
Death.
This is as much a novel about Albus Dumbledore's life story, as it is about Harry
Potter's quest. It is a story that links Dumbledore and Potter and the Dark Lord,
Voldemort in a quite unexpected fashion - each responding very differently to the
same temptation; each motivated in the same quest for immortality by quite different
instincts.
The quest for the Deathly Hallows is perhaps the most intriguing of the developments
in this novel and whilst being the basis of the novel's ingenious title - it is one
that is not really fully explored in the story.
When Potter is presented with temptation he responds quite differently from either
Dumbledore or Voldemort, both of whom pay a price for their greed.
Potter is not tempted to seek immortality for his own sake, but for the sake of what
it may permit him. For the sake of the task he must complete...
Let Potter fail in that task, and Voldemort may exercise an eternal reign of terror
over all the country - and perhaps over all the world.
Neither can live while the other survives. Voldemort must perish if Potter is to
survive. Is that the meaning of the prophecy? Does the prophecy indeed hold any
truth?
Voldemort believes in the prophecy and is driven by it. Consequently, he losses to
some extent his freedom of will: he acts as a robot might. But robots respond to
clear and unambiguous instruction. The prophecy is anything but clear and
unambiguous; nonetheless, casually Voldemort destroys lives as he seeks its
fulfillment.
By his very actions - actions that cry out for a response - he makes the prophecy
come alive, and its fulfillment as much a concern for others as it is for
himself.
Dumbledore's motivations are revealed in the novel to be something complex and in
spite of the attempt to clear up some of these question marks in the awful King's
Cross chapter, there is still a profound air of mystery about the Hogwarts stalwart
even as the novel concludes.
Severus Snape's story achieves some resolution in the clumsy pensieve scene referred
to earlier. Here the closure is more complete but in spite of some access into the
workings of Snape's mind, there remains an even greater sense of mystery and wonder
about his actions than in the case of Dumbledore. Snape is a character with whom the
reader is not intended to relate emotionally.
The aspect of Rowling's writing that works best here is the curious narrative style
that allows Voldemort's latest quest - a quest that ties in with Potter's quest for
the Deathly Hallows - to be presented right alongside Potter's own storyline.
This is done through the curious connection of mind that Potter shares with
Voldemort. The effect, somewhat paradoxically, is to bring an immediacy to
Voldemort's actions that a change in point-of-view could not achieve.
Potter's sudden, swooping insights into Voldemort's activities provide the story with
a fresh momentum resulting from the simple fact that Potter must react to these
insights the moment he sees them - this may mean changing his own schemes, trying to
assess Voldemort's motivations, or trying to convince his critical ally, Hermione
that he is not foolish to give weight to these possibly dangerous visions.
The second and perhaps more important impact of these insights is to provide the
reader with an opportunity to contrast the wide differences in Potter's and
Voldemort's personalities.
Potter is presented with discoveries that must surely challenge his most firmly held
beliefs, sap his courage and emotional strength and challenge his very balance of
mind. He responds with determination, self-believe and resourcefulness and not a
little compassion.
Voldemort's responses on the other hand suggest that he lacks equilibrium of mind,
ability to trust, and ability to live with disappointment. He lacks compassion. In
short Voldemort lacks that which must be evident in a true leader.
Potter is also more capable of withstanding temptation than Voldemort. The lure of
immortality does not destabilize him: the quest for immortality consumes Voldemort.
In spite of Potter's not infrequent rashness, when this one great temptation is
dangled in front of him, he is able to take a step back and to see the matter in it's
proper perspective.
Perhaps the understanding that his mother embraced death that he might live plays a
role in his thinking on this matter. The title of the novel is, after all, very well
chosen.
Bloomsbury Publishing
Unabridged Audio CD Edition – 2007
Read by Stephen Fry